🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of countries are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that phones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". A law is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to pass a proposal raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended families to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a good starting point," commented one MEP driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the government has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Earlier, support gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the government pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing disturbing online content suggests that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to design products and services that are safe and age appropriate for children," commented a leading peer.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, regulation is largely unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional use requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced measures requiring parental consent for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from some politicians to mimic this path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, further states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion continues, the policies of this nation and its followers indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for the industry to self-regulate.